Victoria van den Broek / Roosmalen

Cybersecurity, Data Protection & Enterprise Risk

Leading organisations out of uncertainty, cyber risk, and regulatory scrutiny. Restoring control where failure carries material consequences.

Explore my perspective →
“Organisations rarely lose control suddenly. Warning signs often appear long before consequences become material.”

Escalation

The earliest warning signs are often the easiest to ignore

Confidence is deteriorating

Leadership is no longer certain that risks are understood, owned, and under control.

Questions are being asked

Boards, regulators, investors, clients, legal counsel, or auditors require answers that withstand challenge.

Exposure is becoming visible

Risk begins to affect growth, investment, valuation, market access, reputation, or stakeholder confidence.

Consequences are materialising

An incident, breach, regulatory inquiry, dispute, or crisis demands immediate leadership and defensible decisions.

When it matters

Defensible decisions under pressure

I’m brought in when the cost of being wrong is high: legally, operationally, or reputationally.
  • Regulatory scrutiny

    Regulators require answers, evidence, and decisions that withstand formal challenge.

  • Board accountability

    Leadership must justify ownership, oversight, and decisions with confidence.

  • Material exposure

    Exposure has become significant enough to require intervention or explicit risk acceptance.

  • Strategic decisions

    Important decisions carry consequences that may be difficult to reverse.

  • Decision deadlock

    Stakeholders disagree on exposure, priorities, obligations, or acceptable risk.

  • High-consequence initiatives

    Critical programmes demand independent judgement before commitments are made.

Restoration

Regaining control

  • Clarity

    Understanding what matters, what is at risk, and what comes next.

  • Ownership

    Clear ownership of decisions, priorities, and organisational outcomes.

  • Direction

    A clear path forward through uncertainty, complexity, and disruption.

“The wrong diagnosis makes even excellent execution expensive.”

Approach

Establishing reality

  • What do we really know?

    Separate evidence from opinion and establish what can actually be substantiated.

  • What are we assuming?

    Challenge accepted conclusions and expose blind spots before they become consequential.

  • What are we trying to solve?

    Examine underlying causes before committing resources to treating symptoms.

  • What matters most?

    Distinguish the urgent from the important and decide what can wait.

Perspective

Across boundaries

When trust breaks, consequences follow: exposure escalates, scrutiny intensifies, and organisations lose control. My work restores clarity, ownership, and direction where uncertainty and fragmentation threaten organisational stability.

Having worked across executive leadership, operations, commercial strategy, enterprise risk, compliance, legal affairs, data protection, cybersecurity, and engineering, I connect risks others treat separately and establish coherent direction.

This lets me cut through complexity, stabilise high-risk situations, and translate competing priorities into defensible decisions and effective, coordinated action.

Where failure carries material consequences, sound judgement demands the courage to challenge assumptions, the discipline to confront uncomfortable truths, and the resolve to act decisively under pressure.

The earliest warning signs are often the easiest to ignore. This is where I step in. Whether risk is emerging or already materialising, I operate where most hesitate: turning silence into dialogue, uncertainty into action, and risk into strength.

Signature

Integration

Combining what others separate

  • Executive
    judgement

    Forged through accountability, scrutiny, and consequential trade-offs.

  • Technical
    depth

    Grounded in engineering, architecture, and operational reality.

  • Regulatory
    insight

    Shaped by legal practice, supervisory challenge, and enforcement.

Execution

15+ years operating under pressure

Some of the most important work takes place under conditions that do not permit public disclosure.
“The objective is not to eliminate risk. It is to make informed decisions about it.”
Leadership & Advisory